X. Bibliography

References

If you have references to additional or missing literature or to newly published books/papers, please use the ‚Leave a reply‘ section at the end of this chapter. We will incorporate the bibliographic notes successively. 

(electronic resources retrieved: 07.10.2020)

• AAA (American Anthropological Association) 2009. CEAUSSIC Releases Final Report on Army HTS Program (October 14. https://www.americananthro.org/ParticipateAndAdvocate/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=2591&RDtoken=16893&userID=.
• AAA (American Anthropological Association). 2012. Principles of Professional Responsibility. http://ethics.americananthro.org/category/statement/.
• AAA. 2012. “Informed Consent” in anthropological research: http://ethics.americananthro.org/ethics-statement-3-obtain-informed-consent-and-necessary-permissions/.
• AAA. 2012. Do-No-Harm-prerequisites in anthropological research: see AAA 2012 http://ethics.americananthro.org/ethics-statement-1-do-no-harm/.
• ABv (Anthropologen Beroepsvereniging. 2019. Code of Ethics. https://antropologen.nl/app/uploads/2019/01/ABv_Code-of-Ethics_2019.pdf.
• Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1991. Writing Against Culture. In: Richard G Fox (ed). Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present. Santa Fe, S. 137–162.
• ActionAid International. o. J. Networked Toolbox. Tools Overview. http://www.networkedtoolbox.com/workareas/tools/.
• AG Medical Anthropology. 2005. Ethics Statement. Online. https://www.medicalanthropology.de/english/ethics/.
• AGEE (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwicklungsethnologie). 2001. EthicalGuidelines http://www.uni-trier.de/fileadmin/fb4/ETH/Aufsaetze/Schoenhuth2001_Ethical_Guidelines_of_the_workgroup_development_anthropology.pdf
• AIATSIS. 2012. Guidelines for Ethical Research in Australian Indigenous Studies (GERAIS). (https://beta.aiatsis.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-09/gerais.pdf.
• AIATSIS n.d.[2020]. Revision of the AIATSIS guidelines for ethical research in Australian indigenous studies. Consultation draft. https://aiatsis.gov.au/sites/default/files/docs/research-and-guides/ethics/consult/consultation_draft_guidelines_for_ethical_research_in_australian_indigenous_studies.pdf.
• AIATSIS (2020/07/31; Draft): Guide to a distress protocol: https://aiatsis.gov.au/sites/default/files/docs/research-and-guides/ethics/consult/part_c_distress_protocol.docx.
• AIATSIS. 2020a. AIATSIS Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research (the AIATSIS Code).https://aiatsis.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-10/aiatsis-code-ethics.pdf.
• AIATSIS. 2020b. A Guide to applying the AIATSIS Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research. https://aiatsis.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-10/aiatsis-guide-applying-code-ethics_0.pdf
  
• Alex, Gabriele. 2017. Comment to the Contribution by Hansjörg Dilger. Sociologus, 67,2, 209 – 212.
• ALLEA (All European Academics). 2017. The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Berlin. https://www.allea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/ALLEA-European-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-2017.pdf.
• ALLEA 2020 (All European Academics). Sustainable and FAIR Data Sharing in the Humanities: Recommendations of the ALLEA Working Group E-Humanities. Edited by Natalie Harrower, MaciejMaryl, Beat Immenhauser, and TimeaBiro. Berlin. DOI: 10.7486/DRI.tq582c863. https://repository.dri.ie/objects/tq582c863/files/1544r995j/download?type=Masterfile.
• Allen, Charlotte. 1997. Spies Like Us: When Sociologists Deceive Their Subjects. Lingua Franca 7, no. 9 (1997). http://linguafranca.mirror.theinfo.org/9711/9711.allen.html.
• Anderson, Mary B. 1999. Do No Harm: How Aid Can Support Peace—or War. Boulder, CO: Lynne RiennerPublishers.
• Annechino, Rachelle. 2013. The ethics of openness: How informed is “informed consent”? Ethnography matters (Online Journal): https://ethnographymatters.wordpress.com/2013/03/01/the-ethics-of-openness/.
• Anthropologi.info (Blog). 2005-2010. Anthropology and Military (Links). https://www.antropologi.info/blog/anthropology/?s=military&submit=Search&disp=search.
• Antweiler, Christoph. 2001. Ethnologie jenseits der Akademie, aber nicht ohne sie.In: Helga Unger-Heitsch(Hrsg.): Das Fremde verstehen. Münster etc.: LIT, 1-27.
• Anyaegbunam, Chike, Paolo Mefalopulosund Titus Moetsabi. 2004. Participatory rural communication appraisal. Starting with the People. A Handbook for the SADC Centre of Communication for Development. Rom, FAO. http://www.fao.org/3/y5793e/y5793e00.htm.
• AOIR (Association of Internet Researchers). 2019. Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf.
• Appell,G.N. 1978. Ethical Dilemmas in Anthropological Inquiry: A Case Book. Waltham, MA: Crossroads Press.
• Arunkumar A.S., DeverapalliJ. 2014. Paying informants in Ethnographic Research. In: Biswas Subir(ed.). Ethical Issues in Anthropological Research. Concept Publishing Co, Delhi, 45-55.
• ASA (Association of Social Anthropologists). 2011. Ethical Guidelines for Good Research Practice.’ https://www.theasa.org/downloads/ASA%20ethics%20guidelines%202011.pdf.
• Audiotranskription. 2020. Interviews und DGSVO. https://www.audiotranskription.de/qualitative-Interviews-DSGVO-konform-aufnehmen-und-verarbeiten.
• Bashir, Nadia. 2019. The qualitative researcher: the flip side of the research encounter with vulnerable people. Qualitative Research, Dec. DOI: 10.1177/1468794119884805.
• BBC.2006. Tales from the Jungle. Margaret Mead. Documentary. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjGRCi7ewtY. (59 min).
• Beaulieu, Anne. 2010. From co-location to co-presence: Shifts in the use of ethnography for the study of knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 40(3), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709359219.
• Bejarano, Carolina Alonso, Lucía López Juárez, Mirian A. Mijangos García and Daniel M. Goldstein. 2019. Decolonizing Ethnography: Undocumented Immigrants and New Directions in Social Science. Durham&London: Duke University Press.
• Bell, Kirsten. 2014. “Resisting Commensurability: Against Informed Consent as an Anthropological Virtue.” American Anthropologist 116(3):511–22.
• Bendix, Regina. 2000. The Pleasures of the Ear. Cultural Analysis, 1. https://www.oseeberkeley.edu/~culturalanalysis/volume1/pdf/bendix.pdf.
• Black, Steven B. 2016. Ethics, anthropology, and adjudication. Blog entry. http://ethics.americananthro.org/ethics-anthropology-and-adjudication/.
• Boos-Krueger, A. 1998 Bürgerbeteiligung in der Hessischen Dorferneuerung: Beteiligungsstandards zur Sicherung des partizipativen Programmansatzes in einer zivilgesellschaftlich begründeten Planungs-und Handlungsperspektive. Kassel: Gesamthochschulbibliothek.
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996. Understanding. Theory, Culture and Society, 13-2 (May), 13-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327696013002002.
• Boyer, Dominic and George E Marcus. eds. 2021. Collaborative Anthropology Today. A Collection of Exceptions. Ithaca (New York): Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501753374.
• Bracken-Roche, Dearbhallet al. 2017. The concept of ‘vulnerability’ in research ethics: an in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines Health Research Policy and Systems 15,8, :DOI 10.1186/s12961-016-0164-6. https://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12961-016-0164-6.
• Braukmann, Fabienne, Michaela Haug, Katja Metzmacher, and Rosalie Stolz. 2020. eds. Being a parent in the field. Implications and Challenges of Accompanied Fieldwork. transcript publishing. https://www.transcript-verlag.de/media/pdf/c4/cd/5d/ts4831_1hxKgNIlYltYzu.pdf [Reading Sample].
• Briody, Elizabeth K. / MeerwarthPester, Tracy (2015): Do some Good and other Lessons from the Practice for a New AAA Code of Ethics. In: AAA Ethics Blog (02.02.2015): http://ethics.americananthro.org/do-some-good-and-other-lessons-from-practice-for-a-new-aaa-code-of-ethics/.
• Brodkin, Karen et al. 2011. Anthropology as White Public Space? American Anthropologist. 113,4, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2011.01368.x
• Brokensha, David. 1998. Comment Current Anthropology 39 (2), 236-237
• BSA (British Sociological Association). 2016. Ethics Guidelines and Collated Resources for Digital Research. https://www.britsoc.co.uk/media/24309/bsa_statement_of_ethical_practice_annexe.pdf.
• Calvey, David.2008. “The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing ‘Situated Ethics’ in the Field,” Sociology 42, no. 5, 905-918. http://www.uk.sagepub.com/dqr4/study/Student%20resources/Chapter%2010/Calvey.pdf.
• Caplan, Pat. ed. 2003. The ethics of anthropology: debates and dilemmas. London: Routledge
• Cassell, Joan and Sue Ellen Jacobs (eds.). 1997. Handbook on Ethical Issues in Anthropology. https://www.americananthro.org/LearnAndTeach/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=1942.
• Cassell, Joan. 1997. Case 17: The Case of the Damaged Baby, Case 20: Power to the People; “Case 22: Forbidden Knowledge.
• Cassell, Joan. 1997. How to Hold a Workshop on Ethical Problems in Fieldwork. In: Handbook on Ethical Issues in Anthropology, Joan Cassell and Sue-Ellen Jacobs (eds.) Chap. 6. https://www.americananthro.org/LearnAndTeach/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=12916&RDtoken=17917&userID=5089&navItemNumber=731.
• Chevalier, Jacques M. und Daniel J. Buckles. 2019a. Handbook for Participatory Action, Research, Planning and Evaluation. SAS2 Dialogue. Ottawa. https://www.participatoryactionresearch.net/publications.
• Chevalier, Jacques M. und Daniel J. Buckles. 2019b. Participatory Action Research. Theory and Methods for Engaged Inquiry. London: Routledge
• Christ, Simone, Esther Meininghaus, Tim Röing. 2019. All Day Waiting. Causes of conflict in refugee shelters in Germany. BICC: Working Paper 3. https://www.bicc.de/fileadmin/Dateien/pdf/press/2019/Press_release__l_WP_3_2019_04_24.pdf.
• Clifford, James. 1986. Introduction. Partial Truths. In: J. Clifford and G.E. Marcus (eds). Writing Culture. Berkely etc.: Univ. of California Press, 1-26.
• Coleman, Gabriella, E..2010. Ethnographic approaches to digital media”. Annual Review of Anthropology. 39: 487–505.doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104945.
• Coleman, Gabriella.E. 2014. Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous. London: Verso Books.
• Contexts. 2016. How to do ethnography right. Contexts 15, 2, 1-19. American Sociological Association. http://contexts.sagepub.com. DOI 10.1177/1536504216648145. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1536504216648145.
• Crawford, Gordon/Kruckenberg, Lena/J. Loubere, Nicholas/Morgan, Rosemary. 2017. Understanding Global Development Research: Fieldwork Issues, Experiences and Reflections. London: Sage Publications.
• Cupitt, Rebekah. 2018. We have never been digital anthropologists:  https://anthrodendum.org/2018/02/03/we-have-never-been-digital-anthropologists/.
• D‘Andrade, Roy. 1995. Moral Models in Anthropology. Current Anthropology 36, 3, June, 399-408. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249179049_Moral_Models_in_Anthropology.
• da Col, Giovanni. 2019. Editorial Note: New publishing demands new magic. HAU Journal of Ethnographic Theory 9,1,1-5
• Dauphinée, Elizabeth. 2007. The Ethics of Researching War: Looking for Bosnia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Davies, James and Dimitrina Spencer. 2010. eds. Emotions in the Field: The Psychology and Anthropology of Fieldwork Experience. Stanford University Press.
• DBSH. Deutscher Berufsverband Soziale Arbeit). 2019. Right to refuse testimony – Brochure.
• De Seta, Gabriele. 2018. Three Lies of Digital Ethnography
• De Waal Malefyt and Robert J Morais (eds.). 2017. Ethics in the anthropology of business : explorations in theory, practice, and pedagogy. London: Routledge.
• Derian Der et al. 2010. Human Terrain: War Becomes Academic. Film. Bullfrog Films, Oley, PA.Trailer: https://vimeo.com/ondemand/humanterrainmovie/371873917?autoplay=1.
• Deserranno, Erika et al. 2020. Aid Crowd-Out: The Effect of NGOs on Government-Provided Public Services. NBER Working Paper No. 26928, April 2020
• DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) 2010. Grundsätze zu Forschungsdatenmanagement. https://gfzpublic.gfz-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_2949914_2/component/file_2949913/Grundsaetze_Forschungsdaten_2010.pdf.
• DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft). 2019a. Leitlinien zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis: Kodex. https://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/rechtliche_rahmenbedingungen/gute_wissenschaftliche_praxis/kodex_gwp.pdf.
• DFG (German Science Foundation). 2019b. https://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/rechtliche_rahmenbedingungen/gute_wissenschaftliche_praxis/kodex_gwp_en.pdf.
• DFG (German Research Foundation) 2019c: Rules Of Procedure for Dealing With Scientific Misconduct. https://www.dfg.de/formulare/80_01/80_01_en.pdf.
• dgv. 2018. Positionspapier der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Volkskunde e.V. zu Archivierung, Bereitstellung und Nachnutzung von Forschungsdaten.
• DGV/DGSKA. 2009. Texte zu Ethnologen in Krisen- und Kriegsgebieten: Ethische Aspekte eines neuen Berufsfeldes. (Various texts on anthropologists in conflict areas: The German debate). https://www.dgska.de/project/diskussionsforum-ethnologen-in-krisen-und-kriegsgebieten-ethische-aspekte-eines-neuen-berufsfeldes/.
• DHV (Deutscher Hochschulverband).2020. Ermittler beschlagnahmen Forschungsdaten. Forschung & Lehre.  see  https://www.forschung-und-lehre.de/recht/ermittler-beschlagnahmen-forschungsdaten-3058
• Dickson-Swift, Virginia. 2008. et al. Undertaking Sensitive Research in the Health and Social Sciences. Managing Boundaries, Emotions and Risks. Victoria: La Trobe University.
• Dilger, Hansjörg. 2017. Ethics, epistemology, and ethnography: The need for an anthropological debate on ethical review processes in Germany. Sociologus, 67,2, 191-208. DOI: 10.3790/soc.67.2.191.
• Dilger, Hansjörg, Peter Pels and Margaret Sleeboom-Faulkner. 2018. Guidelines for data management and scientific integrity in ethnography. Ethnography0(0) 1–5. DOI: 10.1177/1466138118819018.
• Dittmer, Cordula & Daniel F. Lorenz. 2018. Forschen im Kontext von Vulnerabilität und extremem Leid – Ethische Fragen der sozialwissenschaftlichen Katastrophenforschung. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 19, 3, Art. 20. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3116.
• Donzelli, Aurora. 2019. Discovering by Surrendering: for an Epistemology of Serendipity. Against the Neoliberal Ethics of Accountability. In: Antropologia, Vol. 6, Numero 1 n.s., aprile. https://www.ledijournals.com/ojs/index.php/antropologia/article/download/1529/1425.
• Downey, Hillary et al. 2007. Researching Vulnerability: what about the researcher? European Journal of Marketing 4,7/8, 734-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560710752375.
• Driessen, Henk. 1998. Romancing rapport: The ideology of ‘friendship’ in the field. Folk, 40, 123-136. https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/160233/160233.pdf?sequence=1.
• du Toit, Brian M. 1980. Ethics, Informed Consent, and Fieldwork. Journal of Anthropological Research 36, 3, 274–86. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3629524
• Dunn, Elizabeth Cullen. 2018. The problem with Assholes. Public Anthropologist. Posted on June 20, https://publicanthropologist.cmi.no/author/elizabeth-dunn/.
• Dutch Anthropological Association.2019. Ethical Guidelines: Avoiding Harm. https://antropologen.nl/app/uploads/2019/01/ABv_Code-of-Ethics_2019.pdf.
• Dwyer, Kevin and Faqir Muhammad.1982. Moroccan dialogues: anthropology in question. Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press.
• Düwell et al. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.590
• EASA. 2018. EASA’s Statement on Data Governance in Ethnographic Projects. https://www.easaonline.org/downloads/support/EASA%20statement%20on%20data%20governance.pdf.
• EC (European Commission 2018a: Ethics in Social Science and Humanities. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/h2020_ethics-soc-science-humanities_en.pdf.
• EC (European Commission). 2018b. Ethics Self Assessment. Step by Step. https://erc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/document/file/EthicsSelfAssessmentStepByStep.pdf
• EC (European Commission). 2019. Open Science. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/open-science.
• EC.2019: Horizon 2020 Programme. Guidance. How to complete your ethics self-assessment. Version 6.1. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/ethics/h2020_hi_ethics-self-assess_en.pdf.
• European Commission. 2020. Grants: Guidance note — Research on refugees, asylum seekers and migrants: V1.1 — 07.01.2020.. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/guide_research-refugees-migrants_en.pdf.
• El Kotni, Mounia, Lydia Z. Dixon, and Veronica Miranda. 2020. “Introduction: Co-authorship as Feminist Writing and Practice.” Member Voices, Fieldsights, February 6. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/introduction-co-authorship-as-feminist-writing-and-practice.
• Ellis, Carolyn, Tony E. Adams & Arthur P. Bochner. 2011. Autoethnography: An Overview. Forum Qualitative Research 12, 1, Art. 10 – January.  https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1589/3095.
• Elon University.2018. Ethical Hypothetical #18: Under- aged Drinking (embarrassing revelations). https://www.elon.edu/u/academics/percs/resources/ethics/scenarios/.
• Eppert, Kerstin et al. 2020. A Rugged Coastline. Ethics in Empirical (De-)Radicalization Research. Netzwerk für Extremismusforschung in Nordrhein-Westfalen. CORE NRW. Forschungspapier 1. https://www.bicc.de/fileadmin/Dateien/Publications/other_publications/Core-Forschungsbericht_1/CoRE_FP_1_2020.pdf.
• Estalella, Adolfo und Tomás Sánchez Criado. 2019. Experimental Collaborations. Ethnography. Through Fieldwork Devices. New York, Oxford: Berghahn.
• Faden, Ruth R. et al. 1986. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Falzon, Mark-Anthony. 2009. ed. Multi-sited ethnography : theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research. Farnham.
• Fassin, Didier. 2008. Beyond Good and Evil? Questioning the anthropological Discomfort with Morals. Anthropological Theory 8,4,: 333-344. https://www.sss.ias.edu/files/pdfs/Fassin/Beyond-good-evil.pdf.
• FAO. n.d. Conducting a PRA Training and Modifying PRA Tools to Your Needs. Chap.6.2.5. Venn Diagram on Institutions. http://www.fao.org/3/x5996e/x5996e06.htm#6.2.5.%20Venn%20Diagram%20on%20Institutions.
• FAO. 2016. Free Prior and Informed Consent. An indigenous peoples’ right and a good practice for local communities. Manual for Practitioners. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6190e.pdf.
• Farmer, Paul. 2004. An anthropology of structural violence. Current Anthropology, 45(3), 305-325. doi: 10.1086/382250.
• Fluehr-Lobban, Carolyn. 1994. Informed Consent in Anthropological Research: We Are Not Exempt. Human Organization 53 (1): 1-10.
• Forum Qualitative Research.2012. Participatory Qualitative Research. 13,1. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/39
• Foucault, M. 1980. Truth and power. In: C. Gordon (ed.) Power/Knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon,109-133.
• franzke, aline shakti, Bechmann, Anja, Zimmer, Michael, Ess, Charles and the Association of Internet Researchers. 2020. Internet Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf.
• Freeman, Derek. 1998. The Fateful Hoaxing of Margaret Mead. Boulder: Westview Press. https://www.theasa.org/networks/apply/ethics/dillemmas.
• Fujii, Lee Ann.  2012. Research Ethics 101: Dilemmas and Responsibilities. PS: Political Science & Politics, 45,4, 717-723. doi:10.1017/S1049096512000819.
• Garner, Andrew. n.d.(a) Ethical dilemmas in professional practice in anthropology. Policy – environment – development. https://www.theasa.org/networks/apply/ethics.html.
• Garner, Andrew. n.d.(b) Ethical dilemmas in anthropological research. In: Garner, A. n.d. (a): https://www.theasa.org/networks/apply/ethics/dillemmas.shtml.
• GIC Network . (Silent) Voices Blog. The Bukavu Series  https://www.gicnetwork.be/silent-voices-blog-bukavu-series-eng/
• Goduka, Ivy N. 1990. “Ethics and Politics of Field Research in South Africa.” Social Problems 37,3: 329–40.
• Göttke, Florian et al. 2013. The ethnographic fact: a discussion of ethics in anthropological fieldwork. Somatosphere. A Collaborative Website. Oct.22. http://somatosphere.net/2019/the-ethnographic-fact-a-discussion-of-ethics-in-anthropological-fieldwork.html/.
• Goffman, Alice. 2014. On the run. Fugitive Life in an American City. University of Chicago Press.
• Goffman, Alice. 2015. TED Talks: http://www.ted.com/talks/alice_goffman_college_or_prison_two_destinies_one_blatant_injustice?language=en.
• Goldstein, D. M. 2014. Qualitative Research in Dangerous Places: Becoming an ‘Ethnographer’ of Violence and Personal Safety, DSD Working Papers on Research Security: No. 1, http://webarchive.ssrc.org/working-papers/DSD_ResearchSecurity_01_Goldstein.pdf.
• Guijt, Irene. 1998, Questions of Difference. Questions of Difference: PRA, gender and environment. A Training Video (PAL). London: IIED.
• Gusterson, Hugh. 1997.Studying Up Revisited. Political and Legal Anthropology Review 20, 1 (May, 114-119). 
• Gusterson, Hugh.2012. “What’s in a Laptop?” Anthropology Now 4,1, 26-31.
• Haggerty, Kevin. 2004. Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics. Qualitative Sociology. 27. 391-414. DOI: 10.1023/B:QUAS.0000049239.15922.a3.
• Hann, Chris. 2006. The Gift and Reciprocity: Perspectives from Economic Anthropology. Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism. In S.-C. Kolm, & J. M. Ytier (eds.), Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity: 1; Foundations (pp. 207-223). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Hanson, Rebecca and Patrizia Richards. 2019. Harassed: Gender, Bodies, and Ethnographic Research. Oakland: Univ. of Calif. Press.
• Hasan, Haim and Esther Hertzog. 2012. eds.  Serendipity in Anthropological Research. The Nomadic Turn. London, Ashgate.
• Hatfield, Colby R. Jr. 1973. Fieldwork: Toward a Model of Mutual Exploitation. Anthropological Quarterly, 46:15-29.
• Hendry, J. 1992. The paradox of friendship in the field. Analysis of a long-term Anglo-Japanese relationship. In: Judith Okely & Helen Callaway eds.  Anthropology and Autobiography, 163-174 .
• Hennell, Kath. 2019. et al. Ethical Dilemmas Using Social Media in Qualitative Social Research: A Case Study of Online Participant Observation. Sociological Research Online.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780419888933.  
• Hess, C. et al.1998. Mit den Augen des Ethnographen. Entwicklungsethnologie 7,2,11-48:   http://www.uni-trier.de/fileadmin/fb4/ETH/Aufsaetze/Mit_den_Augen_Ethno.pdf. [German]
• Heybrock, Matthias. 2018. Besser nicht allein im Feld. Transkulturelle Teams in der Ethnologie. Uni Wisssen, 1. Freiburg. https://www.ethno.uni-freiburg.de/de/dok/uni-wissen_1_2018_tandems_schlehe.pdf.
• Hobart, Mark (ed.)1993 An anthropological critique of development: the growth of ignorance. London: Routledge.
• Hornbacher, Annette.2013.( ed.) Ethnologie und Ethik. Ethnoscripts 15,2.  https://www.ethnologie.uni-hamburg.de/forschung/publikationen/ethnoscripts/es-15-2.html.
• Hornbacher, Annette. 2017. Comment to the contribution by Hansjörg Dilger. Sociologus, 67,2, 213-218.
• Howes, David and Constance Classen.1991. Doing Sensory Anthropology. http://www.sensorystudies.org/sensorial-investigations/doing-sensory-anthropology/.
• Hübinette, Tobias. Is It Possible to Dance with Wolves? A Swedish Antifascist’s Reflections on Benjamin R. Teitelbaum’s Article. Current Anthropology 60,3. https://www.benjaminteitelbaum.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/CA-article.pdf.
• Institute of Social & Cultural Anthropology. n.d. Safety, Fieldwork and Ethics. Univ. of Oxford. https://www.isca.ox.ac.uk/safety-fieldwork-and-ethics#collapse389441.
• Iphofen, Ron. 2013. Research Ethics in Ethnography/Anthropology. Published by the European Commission, DG Research and Innovation. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/ethics-guide-ethnog-anthrop_en.pdf
• Jackson, Thomas. 2018. Multisited ethnography. Sensory experience, the sentient body and cultural phenomena. The University of Leeds. http://www.multisensoryethnography.com/assets/js/pdfjs/web/PhD-TomJackson-print.pdf.
• Jacobs, Carolien. 2020. Getting prior informed consent – a thorny issue. TRAFIG Blog: https://trafig.eu/blog/getting-prior-informed-consent-a-thorny-issue.
• Jacobs, Sue-Ellen. 1997. Case 5: Anonymity Declined. in Handbook on Ethical Issues in Anthropology, ed. Joan Cassell and Sue-Ellen Jacobs, https://www.americananthro.org/LearnAndTeach/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=12923&RDtoken=16518&userID=5089&navItemNumber=731.
• Jacobs, Sue Ellen. 1997. “Case 6: Anonymity Revisited”: http://ethics.americananthro.org/ethics-statement-3-obtain-informed-consent-and-necessary-permissions/
• Jacobsen, Karen & Landau, Loren B. (2003). The dual imperative in refugee research: Some methodological and ethical considerations in social science research on forced migration. Disasters, 27, 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00228.
• Jain, S. 2000 An anthropologist’s experience of working with development practitioners. Paper given at the ASA 200 conference on ‘Participating in Development’, April 2nd to 5th 2000 at SOAS London.
• Johansson, Leanne. 2015.  ‘Dangerous liaisons: risk, positionality and power in women’s anthropological fieldwork’, Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 7,1, 55-63. https://www.anthro.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/anthro/documents/media/jaso7_1_2015_55_63.pdf.
• Johnson, Lisa. 2020. Moves, Spaces and Places: Roots, Pathways and Trajectories of Jamaican Women in Montreal. Diss.: University of Trier.
• Kadushin, Charles. 2012. Understanding Social Networks. Theories, Concepts, and Findings. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press..
• Kipp, Jacob et al. 2006. The Human Terrain System. A Cords for the 21^st century. Military Review, Sep-Oct.
• Kirmayer, Laurence J. 2013. Foreword. In Karen Block, Elisha Riggs & Nick Haslam (eds.):Values and vulnerabilities: The ethics of research with refugees and asylum seekers, pp. v-ix. Toowong: Australian Academic Press.
• Knapp, Rimasara Kuyakanon. 2020. When does fieldwork begin? Negotiating pre-field ethical experiences challenges. In: Fieldwork in the global south. Jenny Lunn (ed.). London: Routledge, 13-24.
• Knibbe, Kim. 2020. Is critique possible in the study of lived religion? Anthropological and feminist reflections, Journal of Contemporary Religion, 35:2, 251-268, DOI: 10.1080/13537903.2020.1759904. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13537903.2020.1759904?needAccess=true..
• Koch, Julia. 2019. Fieldwork as performance. Being ethnographic in filmmaking. Anthropology Southern Africa 42:2, 161-172.
• Koonings, Kees et al. 2019. eds. Ethnography as Risky Business: Field Research in Violent and Sensitive Contexts. Lexington Books.
• Kumar, Somesh. 2002. Methods for Community Participation. A Complete Guide for Practitioners. New Delhi: Vistaar.
• La Folette, Laetitia (ed.) 2014: Negotiating Culture. Heritage, Ownership, and Intellectual Property. Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.
• Lambek, Michael. 2012. Ethics out of the ordinary. In R. Fardon, et al. eds., The SAGE Handbook of Social Anthropology, 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 140–152.
• Lapadat, Judith C. Ethics in Autoethnography and Collaborative Autoethnography. Qualitative Inquiry 23,8, 589-601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704462.
• Lederman, Rena. 2009. Comparing ethics codes and conventions: anthropological, sociological and psychological approaches. Anthropology News September:11–12.
• Lederman, Rena. 2013. Ethics: practices, principles, and comparative perspectives. In: The handbook of sociocultural anthropology. J.G. Carrier and D.B. Gewertz, eds.,  588–612. London: Bloomsbury.
• Lederman, Rena. 2017. Doing Anthropology Ethically Takes Practice: A US Perspective on the Formalization Question. Von Poser Plenary IV: Doing Anthropology Ethically: Is Formalization the Solution? GAA annual meeting, Berlin. Draft. See also: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1469-8676.12526.
• LEK.Project 2014. Giving Back to the Communities: A Compilation of Activities and Initiatives for the Communities Participating in the LEK Project. http://icta.uab.cat/Etnoecologia/Docs/[358]-givingback2014.pdf.
• Loewenson, René et al. 2014. Participatory Action Research in Health Systems: A Methods Reader. Equinet. http://www.equinetafrica.org/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/PAR%20Methods%20Reader2014%20for%20web.pdf.
• Low, Setha  M. & Sally Engle Merry.  2010. Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas. Current Anthropology 51, Suppl 2, Oct. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/653837?seq=1.
• LSE. 2019. LSE Informed Consent Guidance. https://info.lse.ac.uk/staff/Services/Policies-and-procedures/Assets/Documents/infCon.pdf.
• Lubet, Steven. 2017. Interrogating Ethnography: Why Evidence Matters. Oxford University Press.
• Luchner, Carmen Delgado. 2017.  Ethical concerns before, during and after ethnographic research. September 2017  https://interpreting-ideas.com/2017/09/.
• Lunn, Jenny. 2020 ed. Fieldwork in the global south. London: Routledge. Routledge studies in human geography.
• Mackenzie, Catriona, Christopher McDowell, Eileen Pittaway, Beyond ‘Do No Harm’: The Challenge of Constructing Ethical Relationships in Refugee Research. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20, 2, June, 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem008.
• Mauss, Marcel [1925] :1970. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Cohen & West.
• Mclean, K.& C. Panter-Brick. 2018. Violence, Structural and Interpersonal. The Int. Encyclopedia of Anthropology, XII, 6368-6375. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327454020_Violence_Structural_and_Interpersonal.
• McGranahan, C. 2016.ed.  Special Issue: Theorizing refusal. Cultural Anthropology 31, 319-325.
• Mekonen, Solomon A. 2021. I am Black Now: A Phenomenologically Grounded Autoethnography of Becoming Black in Berlin. Online-Essay.  https://www.academia.edu/44914933/I_Am_Black_Now_A_Phenomenologically_Grounded_Autoethnography_of_Becoming_Black_in_Berlin.
• Metooanthro. n.d. A collection of resources about the issue of sexual assault and harassment in anthropology. https://metooanthro.org/resources/.
• Mette-Starke, Benedict. 2021. Avoiding Pitfalls in Engaging with Digital Myanmar: A Post-coup Analysis of Risk Mitigation. https://teacircleoxford.com/2021/03/15/avoiding-pitfalls-in-engaging-with-digital-myanmar-a-post-coup-analysis-of-risk-mitigation-part-1/.
• Minn, Gisela and Marina LeMaire. 2017. Forschungsdatenmanagement in den Geisteswissenschaften c/c https://ubt.opus.hbz-nrw.de/opus45-ubtr/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/799/file/WP_Nr_03_DMP_final_Juli_2017.pdf.
• Mead, Margaret.1928. Coming of Age in Samoa. New York: William Morrow.
• Menih, Helena. 2013. Applying Ethical Principles in Researching Vulnerable Population: Homeless Women in Brisbane. https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/56899/88936_1.pdf?sequence=1.
• Miller, Theresa. 2015.”Listen to your mother’: negotiating gender-based safe space during fieldwork’, Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford 7, 1, 80-87. https://www.anthro.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/anthro/documents/media/jaso7_1_2015_80_87.pdf.
• Mitchell, Thomas & Porter Bailey. 2015. Ethics in Agricultural Sciences. Books Wagon. Arcler Press.
• Molina, José Luis & Steve Borgatti. 2019. Moral bureaucracies and social network research. Social Networks. 22 Nov. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2019.11.001.
• Mookherjee, Nayanika. 2012. Twenty-first century ethics for audited anthropologists. In R. Fardon et al. (eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Social Anthropology, 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 130–140.
• Moors, Annelies. 2019. The trouble with transparency: Reconnecting ethics, integrity, epistemology, and power. Ethnography, Vol. 20(2) 149–169. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1466138119844279
• Mudinga, Emery. 2020. We Barely Know These Researchers from the South! Reflections on Problematic Assumptions about Local Research Collaborators. The Bukavu Series (Blog). June 30. https://www.gicnetwork.be/we-barely-know-these-researchers-from-the-south-reflections-on-problematic-assumptions-about-local-research-collaborators/.
• Mukherjee, Neela. 2002. Participatory Learning and Action: With 100 Field Methods. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company. Merton, Robert K.&Elinor Barber. 2004. The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity: A Study in Sociological Semantics and the Sociology of Science. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
• Murphy, Elizabeth & Robert Dingwall. 2001. The Ethics of Ethnography, Ch. 23 In: Atkinson, P. et al. (eds.) Handbook of Ethnography, London: Sage, 339-351. https://ethnographyworkshop.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/murphy-dingwall-1994-the-ethics-of-ethnography-handbook-of-ethnography.pdf.
• Nader, Laura. 1974 (1969). Up the Anthropologist — Perspectives Gained From Studying Up. In Dell Hymes (ed.) Reinventing Anthropology, New York, pp.284-311.
• Narayanasamy, N. 2009. Participatory Rural Appraisal. Principles, Methods and Applications. New Delhi etc.: Sage.
• Neyfakh, Leon. 2015.The Ethics of Ethnography. Alice Goffman’s heralded book about inner-city life has come under fire for inconsistencies and inaccuracies. Is the author to blame—or does the fault lie with her field? .June 18, 2015 https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2015/06/alice-goffmans-on-the-run-is-the-sociologist-to-blame-for-the-inconsistencies-in-her-book.html.
• Ortner, Sherry B. 2016. Dark anthropology and its others. Theory since the eighties. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6,1, 47-73.  http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.14318/hau6.1.004.
• Pawley, Andrew. 2012. “How Saem became an ethnobiologist and writer: on the collaboration of Ian Saem Majnep and Ralph Bulmer”. Saem Majnep Memorial Symposium on Traditional Environmental Knowledge. University of Goroka. http://pacificinstitute.anu.edu.au/outrigger/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Pawley_Saem_Majnep_Symposium_draft.pdf.
• Pels, Peter. 1999. Professions of Duplexity. A Prehistory of Ethical Codes in Anthropology. Current Anthropology 40,2, 101-136.
• Pels, Peter et al. 2018. Data Management in Anthropology: The Next Phase in Ethics Governance? Social Anthropology/ Anthropologie sociale 26/3: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12526.
• PERCS (The Program for Ethnographic Research & Community Studies). 2018. The Ethics of Fieldwork Module. ELON University. http://www.elon.edu/u/academics/percs/wp-content/uploads/sites/527/2017/09/EthicsModuleforWeb.pdf.
• Perry, Sarah and J.S. Marion. 2010. State of Ethics in Visual Anthropology. Visual Anthropology Review 26,2, 96-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-7458.2010.01070.x.
• Pink, Sarah. 2010a. What is Sensory Ethnography? Lecture. Accessible on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ON7hfORQUio.
• Pink, S. 2010b. Response to David Howes. Social Anthropology. 18,3,336–338.
• Plemmons, Dena, Alex W. Barker (eds.). 2016. Anthropological Ethics in Context: An Ongoing Dialogue. Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press.
• Pollard, Amy. 2009. ‘Field of screams: Difficulty and ethnographic fieldwork’. Anthropology Matters, 11,2, 1-24. https://www.anthropologymatters.com/index.php/anth_matters/article/view/10/10
• Pretty ,Jules. N., I. Gujit, J. Thompson und I. Scoones. 1995. Participatory Learning & Action. A Trainer’s guide. London: IIIED. https://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/6021IIED.pdf.
• Price, David. 2013. Anthropology and Militarism. (Last modified 24 July 2013). DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199766567-0094. Oxford Bibliographies. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199766567/obo-9780199766567-0094.xml.
• Price, David. 2016. Cold War Anthropology: The CIA, the Pentagon, and the Growth of Dual Use Anthropology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
• Quinn, Naomi. n.d.What to Do About Sexual Harassment: A Short Course for Chairs. https://www.americananthro.org/ParticipateAndAdvocate/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=2151.
• Reason, Peter & Bradbury, Hilary (eds.). 2013. The Sage handbook of action research. Participative Inquiry and Practice (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
• Reichertz, Jo. 1999. Gültige Entdeckung des Neuen? Zur Bedeutung der Abduktion in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 24 (4): 47–64. http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/1953/ssoar-oezs-1999-4-reichertz-gultige_entdeckung_des_neuen.pdf?sequence=1.
• Reichertz, Jo. 2009. Abduction: The Logic of Discovery of Grounded Theory. Forum Qualitative Research 11, 1, Art. 13. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1412/2902.
• Rivoal, Isabelle+Noel B. Salazar. 2013. Contemporary ethnographic practice and serendipity. Social Anthropology19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12026.
• Rodemeier, Susanne. 2015. Herausforderungen bei der Erforschung von Christen charismatischer Pfingstkirchen auf Java, Indonesien. Curare 38,1+2:134-146.
• Roth, Wolff-Michael. 2018. A Transactional Approach to Research Ethics. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 19, 3, Art. 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3061.
• Roth, Wolff-Michael & von Unger, Hella. 2018. Current Perspectives on Research Ethics in Qualitative Research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 19(3), Art. 33, http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-19.3.3155.
• Rubinstein Robert A. 2018. Action Anthropology. The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2230. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327459818_Action_Anthropology.
• Rus, Andrej (2008).”‘Gift vs. commoditiy’ debate revisited”. Anthropological Notebooks 14 (1): 81-102. http://www.drustvo-antropologov.si/AN/PDF/2008_1/Anthropological_Notebooks_XIV_1_Rus.pdf.
• Rynkiewich, M.A. and J. P. Spradley. 1976. Ethics and Anthropology: Dilemmas in Fieldwork. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
• Samuel, Gabrielle and Elizabeth Buchanan. 2020. Ethical Issues in Social Media Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics :1 –9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338726872_Guest_Editorial_Ethical_Issues_in_Social_Media_Research.
• Scarce, Rick. 1995. Scholarly Ethics and Courtroom Antics: Where Researchers Stand in the Eyes of the Law. The American Sociologist , Spring, 26, 1: 87-112. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27698716.
• Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 1995. The Primacy of the Ethical. Propositions for a Militant Anthropology. Current Anthropology 36, 3, June, 409-440 (including comments). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2xq430hc.
• Schlehe, Judith and S. Hidayah. 2013. Transcultural Ethnography in Tandems: Collaboration and Reciprocity Combined and Extended. FreiburgerEthnologischeArbeitspapiere23. https://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/fedora/objects/freidok:9155/datastreams/FILE1/.content.
• Schönhuth, Michael. 2002. Negotiating with Knowledge at Development Interfaces. In: Paul Sillitoe et al. (eds): Participating in Development: Routledge Ltd: London. http://www.uni-trier.de/fileadmin/fb4/ETH/Aufsaetze/Negotiating_with_knowledge.pdf.
• Schönhuth, Michael. 2009. Participatory Appraisal of a Personal Network with VennMaker. https://www.vennmaker.com/files/Schoenhuth-1stTestTut-Migrants-Engl-23Mrz2009-All.pdf.
• Schönhuth, Michael. + J.T. Jerrentrup. 2019. Partizipation und nachhaltige Entwicklung. Eine Einführung. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783658278533.
• School of Anthropology (University of Oxford): Risk Assessment. https://anthro.web.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/anthro/documents/media/risk_assessment.docx?time=1561457271658.
• Shah, Ashish. 2017. Democracy of the Ground? Encountering Elite Domination during Fieldwork. In Understanding Global Development Research, Gordon Crawford et al.(eds.), 47–52. London: Sage Publications.
• Shankman, Paul. 2009. The Trashing of Margaret Mead. Anatomy of an Anthropological Controversy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. (Excerpt: https://www.unl.edu/rhames/courses/current/readings/Shankman-Trashing%20of%20Margaret%20Mead.pdf.
• Shankman, Paul. 2013. The ‘Fateful Hoaxing’ of Margaret Mead: A Cautionary Tale. Current Anthropology, 54, 1 (February), 51-70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/669033.
• Shitangsu Kumar Paul. 2013. Vulnerability concepts and its application in various Fields: a review on geographical perspective. Journal of Life and Earth Science, 8: 0-0. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262917175_Vulnerability_Concepts_and_its_Application_in_Various_Fields_A_Review_on_Geographical_Perspective
• Silverman, Adam L. 2009. The Why and How of Human Terrain Teams. Inside higher ED, February 19. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2009/02/19/why-and-how-human-terrain-teams.
• Social Networks. 2005. Ethical Dilemmas in Social Network Research. [Whole issue] https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/social-networks/vol/27/issue/2
• South African San Institute 2017. San Code of Research Ethics. http://trust-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/San-Code-of-RESEARCH-Ethics-Booklet-final.pdf.
• Stocking, George W. 1983. ‘The Ethnographer’s Magic: Fieldwork in British Anthropology from Tylor to Malinowski’, in: G. Stocking (ed.) Observers Observed: Essays on Ethnographic Fieldwork, History of Anthropology Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
• Stoller, Paul. 1989. The Taste of ethnographic things: the senses in anthropology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
• Stone, Rose: „Hot Gifts.” Ethical Dilemma. Stones Response and readers discussion https://www.americananthro.org/ParticipateAndAdvocate/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=1809.
• Stout, Noelle. 2014. Bootlegged: Unauthorized Circulation and the Dilemmas of Collaboration in the Digital Age. Visual Anthropology Reviews, 30,2, 177-187. https://as.nyu.edu/content/dam/nyu-as/faculty/documents/StoutVARBootlegged.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1111/var.12047.
• Strathern, Marilyn, ed. 2000. Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. New York: Routledge.
• Strauss, Annika. 2015. Beyond the Black Box and Therapy Culture. VerstörendeFeldforschungserfahrungenalsZugangzulokalemWissenverstehen lernen. Curare 38,1+2,87-102. (German!).
• Strauss, Annika. 2017. Experiments with image theatre. Accessing and giving meaning to sensory experiences in Social Anthropology. Learning and Teaching. 10,2, 1-24. https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/latiss/10/2/latiss100203.xml#container-3142-item-3139.
• Sultana, Farhana.2007. Reflexivity, Positionality and Participatory Ethics: Negotiating Fieldwork Dilemmas in International Research. ACME6 (3), 374-385 https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/download/786/645/0.
• Takezawa, Yasuko. 2017. ‘Antiracist Knowledge Production: Bridging Subdisciplines and Regions’. American Anthropologist 119 (3): 538–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12921.
• Taylor&Francis. 2017.Co-authorship in the Humanities and Social Sciences A global view. A white paper from Taylor & Francis. https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Coauthorship-white-paper.pdf.
• Taylor, Jodie.2011. The Intimate Insider: Negotiating the Ethics of Friendship When Doing Insider Research. Qualitative Research, 11,1, 3–22. https://core.ac.uk/reader/143874520.
• Teitelbaum, Benjamin R. 2019. Collaborating with the Radical Right. Scholar-Informant Solidarity and the Case foe an Immoral Anthropology.Current Anthropology 60,3. Forum on Public Anthropology (with discussants): https://www.benjaminteitelbaum.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/CA-article.pdf.
• Teves, Lurli. 2000. The sociocultural dimension of people’s participation in community-based development: the role of patron-client system in the Philippines. Witzenhausen.
• Thomson, Susan et al. 2013. eds. The Story Behind the Findings. Emotional and Ethical Challenges for Field Research in Africa. Palgrave
• Tillmann-Healy, Lisa M. 2003. Friendship as a method. Qualitative Inquiry, 9,5, 729-949. http://artnsoul.critstudies.calarts.edu/Qualitative%20Inquiry-2003-Tillmann-Healy-729-49.pdf.
• Townsend, Leann and Claire Wallace. 2016. Social Media Research: A Guide to Ethics. The University of Aberdeen. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Arvind_Singh56/post/Is_there_any_ethical_problem_to_quote_views_expressed_by_researcher_in_RG/attachment/5b77a828cfe4a7f7ca5b1a56/AS%3A660842290884608%401534568488676/download/media_487729_en.pdf
• TRAFIG. 2019. Transnational Figurations of Displacement. https://trafig.eu
• Tremblay, Jessica. 2014.10 Tips for Surviving Anthropological Fieldwork. https://netnographicencounters.com/2014/04/07/10-tips-for-surviving-anthropological-fieldwork/.
• TRUST.2018. A global code of conduct to counter ethics dumping. https://ec.europa.eu/research/infocentre/article_en.cfm?artid=49377.
• Tyler, Steven. A. 1986. Post-modern ethnography: From document of the occult to occult document. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• Ulbert, Veronika. 1995 Erfahrungen mit partizipativen Erhebungsmethoden in der wissenschaftlichen Forschung und in entwicklungspolitischen Praxis. Entwicklungsethnologie 4(2): 75-99.
• Underberg-Goode, Natalie, M. 2020. Digital Ethnography. In: Friese, H. et al (Hg.) Handbuch Soziale Praktiken und Digitale Alltagswelten; pp.393-399. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-08357-1_49.
• Unger, Hella, von. 2016. Reflexivity beyond regulations: Teaching research ethics and qualitative methods in Germany. Qualitative Inquiry 22(2), 87-98. https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/47263/1/1077800415620220.pdf.
• Unger, Hella. v. + P. Narimani. 2012. Ethical Reflexivity in the Research Process: Challenges in Participatory Research. Discussion Paper SP I 2012–304; WZB. Berlin. (German)
• Unger, Hella v., H. Dilger, and M. Schönhuth. 2016. Ethics Reviews in the Social and Cultural Sciences? A Sociological and Anthropological Contribution to the DebateForum. Qualitative SocialResearch, 17(3), Art. 20. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1603203.
• UnitedNations (UN) 2007: DRIPS (Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples):https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf.
• University of Virginia. Vice President for Research. n.d.(a) Consent templates: https://research.virginia.edu/irb-sbs/consent-templates. Oral Consent Card: https://research.virginia.edu/sites/vpr/files/SBS%20Consent/IRB-SBS%20Oral%20Consent%20Card.docx.
• University of Virginia. Vice President for Research. n.d.(b) (IRB-SBS) Vulnerable Participants. https://research.virginia.edu/irb-sbs/vulnerable-participants.
• Utas, Mats. 2009. Debating mercenary anthropology: Maintaining scholarly ignorance or new engagement with the global warscape. Posted in African Politics, Culture, Global Africa.   https://rubeneberlein.wordpress.com/2009/07/20/moral-panic-debating-mercenary-anthropology/.
• Van der Geest, Sjaak. 2015. Friendship and Fieldwork: A Retrospective as ‘Foreword’. Curare 38, 1+2, 3-8. https://www.sjaakvandergeest.socsci.uva.nl/pdf/fieldwork/Friendship_Curare_2015.pdf.
• Virokannas, Elina, SuviLiuski& MarjoKuronen. 2018. The contested concept of vulnerability –a literature review, European Journal of Social Work, https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1508001.
• Vlassenroot, Koen. 2020. Can Collaborative Research Projects Reverse the Dominance of Externally Imposed Narratives on Violence and Conflict? The Bukavu Series (Blog). Sept, 8. https://www.gicnetwork.be/can-collaborative-research-projects-reverse-the-dominance-of-externally-imposed-narratives-on-violence-and-conflict/.
• Wax, , Murray, L. 1980. Paradoxes of ‘Consent’ to the Practice of Fieldwork. Social Problems, Feb., 27,3: 272-283.
• Wright, S. and Nelson, N. 1995. Participatory research and participant observation: two incompatible approaches. In: Nelson and Wright (eds.) Power and participatory development. Theory and practice pp. 43-60. London: ITP.
• Weiner-Levy, Naomi &, Abu Rabia Queder, Sarab. 2012. Researching my people, researching the ‘other’: field experiences of two researchers along shifting positionalities. Quality&Quantity 46, 1151–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-012-9677-4.
• Wilson, Emma. 2016. What is Free, Prior and Informed Consent? Indigenous Peoples and Resource Extraction in the Arctic: Evaluating Ethical Guidelines at the Árran Lule Sami Centre, Ájluokta/Drag, Norway. December. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315550652_What_is_FPIC#fullTextFileContent.
• Wikipedia. Serendipity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serendipity.
• Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2006. The Ethical Challenges of Field Research in Conflict Zones. Qualitative Sociology 29, 3: 373–386. http://web.mnstate.edu/robertsb/445/EthicalChallenges%20of%20Field%20Research%20in%20Conflict%20Zones.pdf.
• Zahara, Alex. 2016. Ethnographic refusal: A how to guide. Discard Studies Blog. https://discardstudies.com/2016/03/21/refusal-as-research-method-in-discard-studies/

If a link got lost in the orcus of the worldwide web, try a search engine with the surname of the author and a string from the title. Otherwise ask me for an electronic copy (schoenhu@uni-trier.de).